portnoy.pizza
The Portnoy Score Index
A public service announcement

You heard 8.3.
You felt heartbreak.
You were wrong.

Somewhere right now a pizzeria owner is staring at a number, googling “is 8.3 good”, and quietly spiraling. This index exists to end that. School taught you 83% is a B-minus. Pizza is not school. On his current scale an 8.3 beats of everything he has scored in the past year. You are not mid. Please call your mother.

01The problem

One number, no context, delivered on a sidewalk to a man holding a paper plate. Nobody has ever known what it means. Not the owner, not the customer, not the guy who drove ninety minutes on the strength of it.

02Pizza-flation

A 7.2 in 2016 and a 7.2 today are not the same pizza. His floor has climbed from to while the ceiling never moved. Your score is competing against a completely different field than it used to. Nobody adjusted for this. We did.

03The fix

All reviews, ranked, era-adjusted, and translated into the only thing that actually matters: where your score truly stands. Then we build you a graphic to post about it.

Exhibit A

This is what an unexplained number does to a person. Every one of these is preventable. A score is not a verdict — it is a position in a field of , and the field has been getting easier for a decade.

The Portnoy Score Index — doing the math nobody asked for, on behalf of pizza.

Translate a score

012345678910

Same percentile, different year. Grey ticks on the rail are every score he gave in the last 12 months. The outlined year is the base year for the one-line verdict.

Year over year

10th–90th pct25th–75thmedianmeanmin–max

The last 12 months

The 9 drought

Score inflation, rolling

mean of last 200 reviews± 1 standard deviation

Live stats

Method

Calibration set. All scores except protest scores below 1.0 and the 14 retro-logged reviews dated 2013–2015. Everything is computed from this set; the excluded records still appear in the ledger with a badge.

Percentile now. Rank of a score within the trailing 365 days of calibration scores (mid-rank on ties).

Year equivalents. Quantile mapping: take the score's percentile now, return the score at that same percentile in the target year, interpolated. It corrects for the average and the spread at once — which matters, because his top decile has held at 8.1 for years while his floor rose from 3.9 to 6.8.

Search

Search every review by score, place, or venue name — or use your location.

Radius

Pins show his score. Red 8.5 and up · black 8.0–8.4 · white 7.5–7.9 · grey below 7.5. Distances are straight-line. Tap a pin for the review.

All-time leaderboard

The highest scores
he has ever given.

Betting board

Latest review

All reviews

All-time rank — where the review ranks by score against every review since 2013 (ties share a rank; protest scores excluded).
All-time % — where the score ranks among every calibration score since 2013.
All-time adjusted — the score's percentile within its own year, re-expressed across all time.

Own one of these places? Tap any score for a shareable official score graphic.

ReviewScoreAll-time
rank
All-time %All-time
adjusted

Ledger key

All-time rankWhere the review ranks by score against every review since 2013. Ties share a rank; protest scores excluded.
All-time %Where the score ranks among every calibration score since 2013.
All-time adjustedThe score's percentile within its own year, re-expressed across all time.
protestBelow 1.0 — excluded from calibration.
archivalRetro-logged 2013–15 — excluded.
unresolvedVenue record missing upstream — score counted.

Grades

Rarefied air97+
Elite90–97
Great75–90
Above average55–75
Average40–55
Below average25–40
Poor10–25
Bad<10

Tap any row to see the restaurants behind it.

Every score